Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 14:49:30 -0700 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RFC: getting rid of oldnfs Message-ID: <5206562.372QOO418I@overcee.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1410241641370.72164@fledge.watson.org> References: <691948956.6194558.1414090646089.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1410241641370.72164@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart14149217.uzY76Sfers Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Friday, October 24, 2014 04:43:28 PM Robert Watson wrote: > On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote: > > Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it up. > >=20 > > 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved > >=20 > > problems with the new one? (I am not aware of any outstanding > > issues in the new nfs that don't exist in the oldnfs.) > >=20 > > 2 - Does anyone see a problem with getting rid of oldnfs for > >=20 > > FreebSD-11? > >=20 > > 3 - If I get rid of it in -head, I can do it either in mid-December= > >=20 > > or mid-April. (I can't do commits during the winter.) > > Does anyone have a rough idea when the 11.0 release cycle will > > start, so I can choose which of the above would be preferable? > > (I figured I'd wait until after the last 10.n release that happe= ns > > =20 > > before 11.0, since it will be easier to MFC before the removal = of > > oldnfs.) > >=20 > > Thanks in advance for any comments, rick > > ps: John, I've cc'd you since I thought you are the guy most likely= to > >=20 > > need to do commits/MFCs to oldnfs. >=20 > I think removing it is fine, but as early as possible (as John says) = to give > our -CURRENT users time to stop working around bugs and start reporti= ng > them > :-). We still use oldnfs at work, even on 11.x, but I'm very much in favor o= f=20 getting back to one single copy. It seems like there's too many things= that=20 are fixed in one stack or the other., We need to stop splitting effort= . I've asked Rick before to remove it and get back to just "nfs" rather t= han=20 "newnfs" etc. =2D-=20 Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; KI= 6FJV UTF-8: for when a ' or ... just won\342\200\231t do\342\200\246 --nextPart14149217.uzY76Sfers Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABAgAGBQJUSslvAAoJEDXWlwnsgJ4E8MEH/jfgie4yIPmPEWYpuY7rgcps wh++ryACt8ZjpEP6ZgiOGBwKg/4Rpl8kpWnGeZOzFEpkt40BxHffYDgOw/SXLIi2 d3FWBD/RtGyknh0DVaCLDWDCviIIIoNkzZGRgUyHprMxtg2HP5Zygp1CQSXR25bA b4Fm0tGH2ms1CUPi5mS5m1UKPKPi/fpkhJ5NXb/W8LuiLz1inLRciNX+C8hFc6nO PMgPx7wlV8raSoXg6qT/Mb3l3eumK8WMj1fLT4TPcrBfI7VlvzjYTL4vmeWpVZdb TAEZGM7jWD5jFv4nOMhuD/3ET36SBzst/FuWqm7MzJiTS/U8fbsjtexzN6m4Yq4= =sBJX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart14149217.uzY76Sfers--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5206562.372QOO418I>