From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 8 14:45:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3521F106566B; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 14:45:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from babkin@verizon.net) Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net (vms173005pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1324F8FC1C; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 14:45:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from babkin@verizon.net) Received: from vms075.mailsrvcs.net ([172.18.12.131]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K3O0004YZC2QFA3@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net>; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 09:38:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 65.242.108.162 ([65.242.108.162]) by vms075.mailsrvcs.net (Verizon Webmail) with HTTP; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 09:45:23 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 09:45:23 -0500 (CDT) From: Sergey Babkin X-Originating-IP: [65.242.108.162] To: Sergey Babkin , =?ISO8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= Message-id: <14092723.330161215528323681.JavaMail.root@vms075.mailsrvcs.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Robert Watson Subject: Re: Re: Proposal: a revoke() system call X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:45:50 -0000 >From: =?ISO8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= >Date: 2008/07/08 Tue AM 06:57:20 EDT >To: Sergey Babkin >Cc: Robert Watson , arch@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Proposal: a revoke() system call >Sergey Babkin writes: >> Robert Watson writes: >> > Seems like that conflicts with our existing revoke(2) system call. >> Aha, I guess when I've checked, I've looked at a real old version of >> FreeBSD. > >"real old", as in "three years before FreeBSD even existed"? revoke(2) >was introduced in 4.3BSD Reno in 1990. I'm looking real stupid right now :-) Maybe I've misspelled it when looked first time. >BTW, could you please switch to a MUA that correctly inserts In-Reply-To: >and / or References: headers? That's my provider's web interface. -SB