Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 08:07:17 +0300 (MSK) From: "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=" (Andrey A. Chernov) <ache@nagual.ru> To: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/netscape-gold3 - Imported sources Message-ID: <199611120507.IAA00542@nagual.ru> In-Reply-To: <199611120410.UAA09461@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at "Nov 11, 96 08:10:24 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Sorry...didn't realize that. But I think it's better to have separate > directories, we can have different COMMENT, DESCR, etc. What do you > think? Separate stuff makes sense, if we really build packages, but now they cause only any possible change duplication in two places. F.e. maybe Netscape change name to java_302 in the next version, it need to be fixed in both netscape3 and netscape3.gold ports without real advantages of such separation. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nagual.ru> http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611120507.IAA00542>