From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 11 19:02:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9663916A4CE for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 19:02:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661A843FBF for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 19:02:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (mi@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAC32Dno013656 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:02:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hAC32BuC013655; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:02:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi) From: Mikhail Teterin To: Jeremy Messenger Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:02:10 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <200311120058.hAC0waVg080112@symbion.zaytman.com> <200311112122.50654@aldan> In-Reply-To: X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users Subject: Re: Upgrade mozilla-firebird to 0.7.1 (not built yet) X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 03:02:22 -0000 On Tuesday 11 November 2003 09:39 pm, Jeremy Messenger wrote: = > On Tuesday 11 November 2003 08:48 pm, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: = > = Why do we need this? It's my understanding that 0.7.1 offers MacOS = > = improvements/fixes only. There shouldn't be a need to upgrade on = > = other platforms. = > Quite possible. I just noticed the newer version, which seemed like = > an easy enough upgrade. That said, the ``0.7.1'' looks better than = > the current ``0.7_1'' and requires no big changes nor downloads. Up = > to you, guys... = Well, not really good reason to me.. :-) We are more look at the end = user, why should they (include we) compile Mozilla Firebird again if = there's no function change? Noone is forced to recompile. But those compiling anew will get the latest, even if it really is the same as the second latest :-) I don't know... -mi