From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 22 18:40:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wemm.org (12-232-135-171.client.attbi.com [12.232.135.171]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF08337B422 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:40:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (overcee.wemm.org [10.0.0.3]) by fw.wemm.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3N1eVe28369 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:40:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACF638CC; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:40:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Mike Meyer Cc: Jordan Hubbard , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ssh + compiled-in SKEY support considered harmful? In-Reply-To: <15556.45867.668486.259740@guru.mired.org> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:40:31 -0700 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20020423014031.8ACF638CC@overcee.wemm.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Meyer wrote: > In <200204230039.g3N0dQ8i011313@winston.freebsd.org>, Jordan Hubbard typed: > > My question: Who's "wrong" here, FreeBSD or Mac OS X? If the latter, > > Someone decided that FreeBSD should do challengeresponse > authentication by default. You can fix it by uncommenting the line > "#ChallengeResponseAuthentication no" in /etc/ssh/sshd_config. AHA! I've been wondering about this too. I cheated and set "Protocol 1,2" to avoid the whole issue. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message