From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 23:25:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51E016A418 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:25:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6146F13C478 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:25:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 11546 invoked by uid 399); 26 Jan 2008 23:25:22 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2008 23:25:22 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <479BC160.4080207@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:25:20 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Messenger References: <200801201628.m0KGSlq6037319@repoman.freebsd.org> <200801212057.33990@aldan> <20080122022122.GA37321@k7.mavetju> <200801220929.29201.mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com> <1201027632.54891.6.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <479B6A3D.10108@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mikhail Teterin , cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Edwin Groothuis , Joe Marcus Clarke , Mikhail Teterin , cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/ekiga pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:25:23 -0000 Jeremy Messenger wrote: > What about users' systems that use > ports? What if one of user decide to uninstall ekiga? It will ending up > with leftover files in their system. Bump is need to have their system > clean. I admit that is a case I had not considered. I suppose in light of that issue, bumping makes more sense, even if it is still unpalatable. > As for not like to build again, perhaps we need to come up with > new *VERSION like PLISTVERSION that will only fix plist without have to > rebuild. Yes, that would be very nice indeed. It would require some thought on how to do it right, but I think this would be a very nice addition. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection