From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Dec 15 12:30:57 2000 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 12:30:56 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mothra.ecs.csus.edu (unknown [130.86.76.220]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B68737B400 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:30:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mothra.ecs.csus.edu (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBFLvOX59102 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 13:57:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joseph@randomnetworks.com) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 13:57:24 -0800 (PST) From: Joseph Scott X-Sender: scottj@mothra.ecs.csus.edu To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Using HAS_CONFIGURE to enforce PREFIX Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I've been updating a couple of ports and noticed something. Both of these ports use configure, but weren't honoring PREFIX. After looking through bsd.port.mk I came across HAS_CONFIGURE, who as a default of adding --prefix=${PREFIX} to the configure args. This made both of the ports in question correctly install into PREFIX instead of /usr/local. Is this the right way to enforce PREFIX with configure'd ports? FYI, the two ports are ftp/cftp and security/stunnel *********************************************************** * Joseph Scott The Office Of Water Programs * * joseph@randomnetworks.com joseph.scott@owp.csus.edu * *********************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message