From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 6 15:20:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.dyn.ml.org (spain-37.ppp.hooked.net [206.169.228.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281A7155D0 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 15:20:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Received: from localhost (garbanzo@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.dyn.ml.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA33299; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 15:18:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 15:18:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex Zepeda To: "David O'Brien" Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RE: EGCS optimizations In-Reply-To: <19990406151633.A28346@nuxi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, David O'Brien wrote: > > Well what would be the chances of getting the pgcc patches committed? > > I'm quite interested in doing this, BUT only after the dust has settled > on the EGCS import and the Alpha build is fixed. Also the 1.1.2 PGCC > patches aren't available yet. Cool!! > jdp and I have another round of bootstraping to fix our current > less-than-optimal exception handling. I want to wait a week or so > until putting the changes into the tree. Well, congrats on the reasonably smooth job so far. The only other thing I'd have on my wish list is the ability to not build the gcc related bits (so I could say drop in TenDRA) by adding -DNO_GCC or something. - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message