From owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 14 02:55:04 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C43DF16A4CE; Fri, 14 May 2004 02:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linda-3.paradise.net.nz (bm-3a.paradise.net.nz [202.0.58.22])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 18CE143D2F; Fri, 14 May 2004 02:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz)
Received: from smtp-3.paradise.net.nz (smtp-3b.paradise.net.nz [202.0.32.212])
 by linda-3.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz)
 with ESMTP id <0HXP00KWA7JQR5@linda-3.paradise.net.nz>; Fri,
 14 May 2004 21:55:02 +1200 (NZST)
Received: from paradise.net.nzsmtp-3.paradise.net.nz
	(Postfix) with ESMTP	id 6CC49ADF5F;
	Fri, 14 May 2004 21:55:02 +1200 (NZST)
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 21:57:05 +1200
From: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
In-reply-to: <200405131507.05183.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Message-id: <40A497F1.9000506@paradise.net.nz>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040404
References: <40A32FB4.2030601@paradise.net.nz>
 <200405131507.05183.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
cc: freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: SMP disables USB mass storage in Freebsd 4.9 RELEASE
X-BeenThere: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD SMP implementation group <freebsd-smp.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp>,
	<mailto:freebsd-smp-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-smp>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-smp@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-smp-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp>,
	<mailto:freebsd-smp-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 09:55:04 -0000

Hi John, thanks for the swift reply,

with respect to 5.x, I did run 5.1 for a while, but 4.9 seemed to have 
better performance for the stuff I tend to do (typically database / io 
intensive), so would like to keep using 4.9 until the 5.x tree gets to a 
similar level - however, I have not tried 5.2....so may be out of date 
with my impression...:-)

> Which IRQ does uhci0 (or ohci0) get?

Think its uhci0 - and, err.. how do I tell which IRQ it gets ?

regards

Mark