From owner-freebsd-audit Mon Jul 16 1:59:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E710837B405 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 01:59:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 16 Jul 2001 09:59:24 +0100 (BST) To: Dima Dorfman Cc: audit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: inetd(8) warns patch In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 16 Jul 2001 01:55:25 PDT." <20010716085525.D423B3E28@bazooka.unixfreak.org> X-Request-Do: Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:59:23 +0100 From: David Malone Message-ID: <200107160959.aa79657@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > David Malone writes: > > (I'm also slightly suprised that the WARNS flags don't whine about > > the nasty SWAP marco which contains a gccism.) > IIRC WARNS doesn't set -ansi or -pedantic because some of our header > files don't compile cleanly with them. TenDRA had a neat feature in this respect. It wouldn't give warnings about system header files unless you specifically asked for them. This way you could have compilerisms in the system headerfiles (where they should be I guess) and still make sure that your compiler-independant code was checked correctly. Maybe we should ask the gcc people for such a feature. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message