Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 Sep 2000 19:51:14 -0400
From:      Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com>
To:        mi@aldan.algebra.com
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: firewall rules for applications
Message-ID:  <20000911195114.Z47559@jade.chc-chimes.com>
In-Reply-To: <200009112337.TAA27194@misha.privatelabs.com>; from mi@aldan.algebra.com on Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 07:37:21PM -0400
References:  <20000911185759.W47559@jade.chc-chimes.com> <200009112337.TAA27194@misha.privatelabs.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 07:37:21PM -0400, mi@aldan.algebra.com wrote:

> = It's reasonable to assume it can be done, but its only going to slow down
> = ipfw even worse then it already is.
> 
> But only if one chooses to use the new feature, right?

Bhahahahahahaha. No.

Once I can get in_pcblookup_hash to stop infinite looping (no details, just
happened), I'll have a patch that tries to avoid that problem.

-- 
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
                billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000911195114.Z47559>