Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 10:39:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> To: Andrew Boothman <andrew@cream.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>, olgeni@uli.it, ruslan@shevchenko.kiev.ua, seb@bluetail.com, Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org, Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, doc@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com Subject: Re: erlang port -- a poster child (Re: I'll be rolling a 4.1.1 r Message-ID: <200009201439.e8KEdli71369@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.000920031025.andrew@cream.org> from Andrew Boothman at "Sep 20, 2000 03:10:25 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew Boothman once stated: =* If the PR is for a port make sure that "port update" is in the =synopsis field, if only so that it catches Neil Blakey-Milner's regular =check for such PR's, but also to act as a good description. = =* If you are the MAINTAINER of a piece of code (or more likely a port) =and don't have commit privs, put "MAINTAINER update" in the synopsis, =for the same reasons as before. Use of synopsis for this worries me. Perhaps, this warrants two new classes: ``update'' and ``maintainer-update'' in addition to the all-including ``change-request''? -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200009201439.e8KEdli71369>