Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:04:54 -0700 From: "Gary W. Swearingen" <garys@opusnet.com> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: docs/84467: bsdlabel(8) manpage uses archaic "pack" in "apropos" string Message-ID: <8hoe8h2lop.e8h@mail.opusnet.com> Resent-Message-ID: <200508020110.j721AMtV028376@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 84467 >Category: docs >Synopsis: bsdlabel(8) manpage uses archaic "pack" in "apropos" string >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-doc >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: doc-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Tue Aug 02 01:10:22 GMT 2005 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Gary W. Swearingen >Release: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE i386 >Organization: none >Environment: n/a >Description: (I didn't see in http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/pr-guidelines/ how to re-open a closed PR, so I'm filing this new one because the closer of the old one intended to fix it but I'm fairly sure overlooked it when someone else started changing the manpage.) The manpage also still uses "partition" like the rest of the PC world (instead of slice) in (at least) the first sentence, but since I don't like using "slice" anyway, I didn't patch it. That's about all I can bear to check, after I spent at least a week preparing a 1300-line patch for the 4.x version and having it pretty-much ignored without a "sorry" or "thanks anyway". Boo hoo. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: --- bsdlabel..orig.8 Mon Aug 1 17:24:42 2005 +++ bsdlabel.8 Mon Aug 1 17:35:19 2005 @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ .Os .Sh NAME .Nm bsdlabel -.Nd read and write disk pack label +.Nd read and write BSD label .Sh SYNOPSIS .Nm .Op Fl A >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8hoe8h2lop.e8h>