From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 17:29:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE7716A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:29:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6C4543F75 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:29:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com) Received: (qmail 65948 invoked by uid 1000); 19 Nov 2003 01:29:57 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:29:57 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson To: Eric Anderson In-Reply-To: <3FBAC2DB.1080004@centtech.com> Message-ID: <20031118172757.S65940@root.org> References: <20031116120622.O57495@root.org> <200311180346.22259@harrymail> <20031118095752.R64353@root.org> <200311182346.13704@harrymail> <3FBAC2DB.1080004@centtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: acpi_cpu_idle panic (Was: Re: kernel panic with todays source) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 01:29:56 -0000 On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Eric Anderson wrote: > >And here is what you requested in your first patch: > > > >cale:~> sysctl hw.acpi.cpu > >hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0 > >hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: 0 > >hw.acpi.cpu.cx_history: 0/0 > > Ok - what do I need to do to try this new acpi stuff out? I'm running > -current as of Nov 14th, and I'd like to help debug/test this on my > notebook.. cvsup to -current as of today would be a good first start. The code was committed Nov 15. Then boot with acpi enabled and post the output of sysctl hw.acpi.cpu. You can try different levels by doing sysctl hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest=x where x is 0...(number_supported_states - 1) -Nate