Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Feb 2004 01:44:03 -0600
From:      Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
To:        Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Feature Request: /usr/local/etc/rc.conf support
Message-ID:  <20040222074403.GB33450@dan.emsphone.com>
In-Reply-To: <1077429634.98580.21.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
References:  <87u11p8sl6.fsf@gray.impulse.net> <20040222055417.GA3941@dragon.nuxi.com> <1077429634.98580.21.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Feb 22), Joe Marcus Clarke said:
> On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 00:54, David O'Brien wrote:
> 
> > 
> > WHY in the world is there even a /usr/local/etc/rc.subr ???
> > /etc/rc.subr on 5-CURRENT is perfectly fine.
> 
> It was needed for a short time to workaround a package problem on
> bento.  As of the last round of bsd.*.mk changes, this is no longer the
> case.  /etc/rc.subr is used where it exists.

Also needed for 4.x systems.

-- 
	Dan Nelson
	dnelson@allantgroup.com


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040222074403.GB33450>