Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:46:10 +0100
From:      Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@FreeBSD.org>
To:        marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org,  svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r391493 - head/cad/tkgate
Message-ID:  <559BADF2.2080906@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <559BA846.4030506@marino.st>
References:  <201507070635.t676Zaqw085725@repo.freebsd.org> <559B9C36.2060300@FreeBSD.org> <559BA1B2.4050002@marino.st> <559BA55C.2080701@FreeBSD.org> <559BA846.4030506@marino.st>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 07/07/2015 11:21, John Marino wrote:
> On 7/7/2015 12:09 PM, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote:
>> 
>> I've checked iconv.mk and that's why I'm writing this message. It
>> is broken by definition. It doesn't follow the sane semantics of
>> options (obviously, `build` and `lib` are *NOT* mutually
>> exclusive as they are currently).
> 
> "lib" includes "build", always. At best its redundant.  However,
> this is out of scope for me.  Open a PR on it if you feel that
> strongly about it.
> 
> 
>>> It means the libc iconv isn't good enough and you need the
>>> ports libiconv.
>> 
>> Ok, so it's the new definition of 'translit' term isn't it? No it
>> is not! The proper name for this option should be something like
>> 'port' and not 'translit'.
> 
> too snarky, won't respond to this.
> 
>>>> Thirdly, isn't it a polite policy to send a notice to a 
>>>> maintainer *before* committing some change to port?
>>> 
>>> If the port is broken, it's broken. "Just fix it" means if
>>> somebody knows how to fix breakage shown on portsmon, we can
>>> do.   (You're welcome; I did send a courtesy message seconds
>>> after this commit)
>> 
>> It seems that you don't understand the word 'polite' as well.
> 
> 
> Everything I did was permissible.  I did not have to send the
> followup message, I did that out of courtesy.  I am not required to
> "be polite" as you define it.  I feel that I was courteous and I'm
> sorry you don't think so.


Ok, from what I'm being observing in your communications with other
developers, I can conclude that it's meaningless to talk with you
about conventions that exist within the community.

- -- 
Vsevolod Stakhov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=xWgR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?559BADF2.2080906>