From owner-freebsd-ia64 Sun Sep 9 9:45:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Received: from anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.92]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3E937B405 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 09:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [62.49.251.130] (helo=herring.nlsystems.com) by anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 15g7iH-0004q3-0Y; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 17:45:41 +0100 Received: from salmon.nlsystems.com (salmon [10.0.0.3]) by herring.nlsystems.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f89GiPc64501; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 17:44:25 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 17:44:02 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: Subject: Re: Ski port In-Reply-To: <20010909000427.A33296@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> Message-ID: <20010909174317.V406-100000@salmon.nlsystems.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > Guys, > > I started working on the ski port today. I have it compiling, but > not linking. I have to implement the FreeBDS syscalls first. A > thought struck me: what if I, instead of implementing most syscalls > so that ski can be used for user processes, I implement an EFI > interface first? > > We're currently not really interested in userland code, so we're > going to run ski in "raw" mode anyway. I should be able to hack > something together that allows us to work on a real EFI bootloader. > With a combination of fake and real ACPI entries we should be able > to boot a kernel as if it was running on real hardware, right? > > Thoughts? That would probably be pretty useful. It sounds like a *lot* of work though. EFI is pretty extensive. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Phone: +44 20 8348 6160 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ia64" in the body of the message