Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 10:54:56 +0200 From: Torbjorn Granlund <tg@gmplib.org> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Downplaying a serious issue Message-ID: <86sipu7py7.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404022118570.76387@wonkity.com> (Warren Block's message of "Wed\, 2 Apr 2014 21\:43\:28 -0600 \(MDT\)") References: <861txffcgh.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404022118570.76387@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> writes: =20=20 Do we? What should it say? Please be specific, preferably in the form of a PR. Is this really a doc problem? =20=20 Full disclosure. Don't downplay. Both the scope and the gravity of the issue is grossly downplayed here The truth is that FreeBSD/i386 10 is completely unusable under all three major type 1 virtualisers. It should not be used, or one will cause data loss. It might be embarrasing to fess up about bugs, but downplaying serious issues make people lose confidence. Which is worst? Torbj=C3=B6rn Please encrypt, key id 0xC8601622
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86sipu7py7.fsf>