From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jan 27 15:46:46 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA01670 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 15:46:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA01659 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 15:46:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA08012; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:46:40 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id QAA24692; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:46:39 -0700 Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:46:39 -0700 Message-Id: <199901272346.QAA24692@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Sean Eric Fagan Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG, julian@whistle.com Subject: Re: "JAIL" code headed for -current. In-Reply-To: <199901272343.PAA06079@kithrup.com> References: <199901272333.QAA24533@mt.sri.com> <199901272343.PAA06079@kithrup.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >But then we're still having an API change that doesn't have to be there. > > No, it's not. You missed the point. Julian mentioned that since there were no 3.0 lkm's that might user 'suser()', there is no ABI to stay compatible with, hence it's an ABI change that doesn't affect anything given that ELF is the new 'binary' format. My point was that even though we could still live with the ABI change, we'd still have an API change by adding the first parameter to suser(). Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message