Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Feb 2013 19:38:23 +0000
From:      Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To:        Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Cc:        freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: removing prefixed border radius properties
Message-ID:  <CADLo83-mN_5Mfvzn6YVGzp7KiAi3Ech95kBBGqbKUwdPNSU9hA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgk=YWC_Pco714=FtazMh2KgUg31er4mVhEvw66=6MkjYg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAF6rxgnvLTUTRWegm5Hdufz201iB7vS-GYTmESOhUc1TDKFrig@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo8386ynHW4OF29aW3SSGjozkaMg2Xyx756g99GeKXQ8eByg@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgk=YWC_Pco714=FtazMh2KgUg31er4mVhEvw66=6MkjYg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13 Feb 2013 18:33, "Eitan Adler" <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote:
>
> On 13 February 2013 10:31, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Do they hurt?
>
> Extra pointless bytes.
>
> > Many companies/workplaces still use older IE for example.
>
> Older IEs are not currently supported, so they don't count.
>
> Older Fx, Safari, etc. are not common.

I get that they're not supported or common, but I'm disputing the
usefulness of this removal right now.

Don't we usually make changes because they're useful?  This has a downside
and no real upside.

Chris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-mN_5Mfvzn6YVGzp7KiAi3Ech95kBBGqbKUwdPNSU9hA>