Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 12:51:20 +0530 From: "Jayachandran C." <jchandra@freebsd.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r225892 - head/sys/mips/mips Message-ID: <CA%2B7sy7D6h5a08Q6yNfX6xSqwabDLzE5GLu5aV3fCMYQKn_4AoQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmokAsDpjJLt%2BVJ2gDGX%2BiMAwZvL2TPaaAD_LRm-Yyquxig@mail.gmail.com> References: <201110010556.p915uQH6003016@svn.freebsd.org> <CA%2B7sy7BiRvTB79H9=y%2BS4jQ=%2BboW1bcDJn%2BBULMmJU9KLLVJ5A@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmokAsDpjJLt%2BVJ2gDGX%2BiMAwZvL2TPaaAD_LRm-Yyquxig@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > Reverting it unfortunately doesn't help; it messes up the event timer stuff. I would like to understand this, reverting r216862 would take out the critical_enter() and cpu_idleclock() which would keep the timer interrupts coming is as usual, this should not affect the event timer. > I'd like to see a more permanent solution. What I suggest we do moving > forward is: > > * create a function pointer setup, like what i386 does > * override it per-platform and per-chipset, once we know what the > correct behaviour should be. > > Are you able to figure out how to achieve correct timer/interrupt/wait > handling on XLR? I'm not aware of any platforms which provide an equivalent of 'sti', so going for an implementation per platform may not help. JC.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2B7sy7D6h5a08Q6yNfX6xSqwabDLzE5GLu5aV3fCMYQKn_4AoQ>