From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 08:44:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758D616A4CE for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 08:44:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from priv-edtnes12-hme0.telusplanet.net (outbound03.telus.net [199.185.220.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E8C43D77 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 08:43:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jearl@telus.net) Received: from [192.168.19.4] (really [142.179.173.206]) by priv-edtnes12-hme0.telusplanet.netESMTP <20040120164340.CCRH25298.priv-edtnes12-hme0.telusplanet.net@[192.168.19.4]>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:43:40 -0700 From: James Earl To: Rishi Chopra In-Reply-To: <400CA8CB.4060501@cal.berkeley.edu> References: <400C44D8.6010408@cal.berkeley.edu> <1074547919.889.24.camel@work> <400CA8CB.4060501@cal.berkeley.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1074617095.8101.5.camel@work> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:44:55 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port Forwarding X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:44:19 -0000 On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 21:04, Rishi Chopra wrote: > No, those are the values in the file. I had posted a previous question > to the list asking what the right values should be (my rl0 interface is > configured via DHCP) - any ideas what I should put in this section? > > James Earl wrote: > > > On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 13:58, Rishi Chopra wrote: > > > >>Here's the rc.firewall file, with comments trimmed for formatting: > >> > >>[Ss][Ii][Mm][Pp][Ll][Ee]) > >> ############ > >> > >> # set these to your outside interface network and netmask and ip > >> oif="rl0" > >> omask="255.255.255.0" > >> oip="me" > > > > > > I'm assuming these aren't the real values you have in your actual > > rc.firewall. > > Maybe I shouldn't have been surprised to see 255.255.255.0 as your ISP's subnet mask... I'm not sure. I'm definitely not an expert. Is that in fact your ISP's subnet mask? James