From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 31 0: 1: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAFB37B401 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:01:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from tara.freenix.org (keltia.freenix.org [62.4.20.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4DE43E77 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:01:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roberto@tara.freenix.org) Received: by tara.freenix.org (Postfix/TLS, from userid 101) id 407B32A90; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:01:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:01:05 +0100 From: Ollivier Robert To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: libc size Message-ID: <20021031080105.GA77041@tara.freenix.org> Mail-Followup-To: current@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20021030233106.32D292A896@canning.wemm.org> <3DC06EB1.CCF3B30D@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DC06EB1.CCF3B30D@mindspring.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT K6-3D/266 & 2x PIII/800 SMP User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG According to Terry Lambert: > The PIC overhead is likely unavoidable. I'd actually like to see > the "benchmark" run on statically linked PIC vs. non-PIC code, so I remember that when I was working on Perl and the FreeBSD port (back in the early 5.000 days), having libperl shared was adding a fairly large overhead. "make test" ran in between 15% and 25% more time in the shared libperl case... -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 5.0-CURRENT #80: Sun Jun 4 22:44:19 CEST 2000 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message