Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:36:50 +0000 From: RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> To: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl>, Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Native 5.3 port of OpenOffice? Message-ID: <200501041336.51258.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> In-Reply-To: <20050104125803.GA46516@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <20050103204341.GB26032@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.BSI.4.61.0501042340250.12968@dave.horsfall.org> <20050104125803.GA46516@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 12:58, Stijn Hoop wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:46:48PM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > > > direction of http://download.openoffice.org/1.1.4/index.html > > > > And if you follow the ports route instead, just how many more bloody > > hoops do we have to jump through? > > You really do not want to compile OpenOffice if you're not willing to jump > through hoops. It is the biggest beast in the ports tree afaik. > > That said, there is a WITHOUT_JAVA knob for it. Try that and see if you > need to jump through this particular hoop again. Try it, but I suspect it wont help. jdk is optional for running OO, but I think building it requires a java-based build tool.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200501041336.51258.list-freebsd-2004>