Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:47:34 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Mike Makonnen <mtm@identd.net>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: RCng -- INFO: X depends on Y, which will be forced to start.
Message-ID:  <20030822164734.GA71360@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030821165906.GB6266@kokeb.ambesa.net>
References:  <20030821161114.GA7094@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030821163749.GC11682@spc.org> <20030821165906.GB6266@kokeb.ambesa.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:59:06PM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 05:37:49PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:11:14AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > What do people think?  Can we loose these type of warnings?  I'm not sure
> > > what their need is.  The beauty of RCng is that I can say I want Amd (for
> > <snip>
> > 
> > I agree with you, but perhaps the warnings should be preserved elsewhere?
> > Or toggleable via an rc.conf switch?
> 
> I already took care of this a couple of days ago.

thanks!



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030822164734.GA71360>