Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 08:27:21 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/vegastrike-data Makefile Message-ID: <20080531082720.GA96134@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1212139911.77420.0.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> References: <200805292137.m4TLbovR008617@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080530092620.GA11389@FreeBSD.org> <1212139911.77420.0.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:31:51AM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Alexey Dokuchaev p??e v p? 30. 05. 2008 v 09:26 +0000: > > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 09:37:50PM +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > pav 2008-05-29 21:37:50 UTC > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > games/vegastrike-data Makefile > > > Log: > > > - Disallow this from pointyhat builds; we don't need to repackage 520 MB of > > > game data and load it on all our mirrors > > > > Why not follow the way it's done in e.g. games/nexuiz port and alike?? > > Looks like it gives more control to user. > > This will not affect end-users in any way. PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined > in and _only_ in pointyhat environment. > > End users can still `make package' and all that. Unless I'm missing > something? Ah, OK, so if I simply want to prevent building what can be called "official" package (which will be put on ftp.freebsd.org and mirrors), I should check for PACKAGE_BUILDING and set IGNORE (or maybe NO_PACKAGE is better?). If there is some inherent problem with building a package (not just to reduce payload on our DVDs), like legal issues with the software, I just use NO_PACKAGE. Am I getting this right? ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080531082720.GA96134>