Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:24:23 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64/82178: missing 32bit subsystem Message-ID: <20050613192423.GC4323@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <200506131122.28463.peter@wemm.org> References: <200506122320.j5CNKQAF023114@freefall.freebsd.org> <20050613021258.GA5242@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050613071337.GA25893@ip.net.ua> <200506131122.28463.peter@wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:22:28AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > On Monday 13 June 2005 12:13 am, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 07:12:58PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > There is a known issue that there are some missing bits in the 5.4 > > > src/release/Makefile such that the 'base' tarball doesn't contain > > > the 32-bit ld.so and 32-bit shared libs. > > > > This should be fixed in Makefile.inc1, not in release/Makefile. > > That looks a step in the right direction, but I wonder if we can have > this stuff in a seperate sysinstall-selectable distribution instead of > the base dist? Agreed, it would be nice to have more granularity in our install bits. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050613192423.GC4323>