From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 7 7:32:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from citadel.cequrux.com (citadel.cequrux.com [192.96.22.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CD337C3B2 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 07:31:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gram@cequrux.com) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by citadel.cequrux.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) id QAA03543; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 16:30:38 +0200 (SAST) Received: by citadel.cequrux.com via recvmail id 3455; Fri Jul 7 16:30:02 2000 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 16:31:51 +0200 From: Graham Wheeler Organization: Cequrux Technologies X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 2.2.8-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim King Cc: Thomas David Rivers , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Any chance of changing struct member names in nameser.h? References: <200007071320.JAA86645@lakes.dignus.com> <003d01bfe81e$553eb8a0$a44b8486@jking> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jim King wrote: > > In that case, although it's considerably more work I'd take a look at > writing some C wrappers around the offending stuff. You could write the > wrappers such that they'd compile with the offending include file, and be > callable from C++. Sounds tedious and time consuming, but it might be > quicker than waiting for someone to fix the headers in question. Yes, I could do that - I have done that already for curses.h. But I still think it sucks badly that there is a variable named 'class', and I still think it should be changed. -- Dr Graham Wheeler E-mail: gram@cequrux.com Director, Research and Development WWW: http://www.cequrux.com CEQURUX Technologies Phone: +27(21)423-6065 Firewalls/VPN Specialists Fax: +27(21)424-3656 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message