From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 6 19:50:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D07F16A402 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2006 19:50:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Stephen.Clark@seclark.us) Received: from smtpout06-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout06-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFA1143E00 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2006 19:50:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Stephen.Clark@seclark.us) Received: (qmail 12801 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2006 19:50:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (24.144.77.138) by smtpout06-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.227) with ESMTP; 06 Apr 2006 19:50:10 -0000 Message-ID: <443570EE.6080703@seclark.us> Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:50:06 -0400 From: Stephen Clark User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22smp i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010110 Netscape6/6.5 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "[LoN]Kamikaze" References: <20060405200341.GD14126@math.jussieu.fr> <20060405200727.GA28371@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060405201500.GE14126@math.jussieu.fr> <20060405211154.GA30089@soaustin.net> <44350FDF.1060206@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <44350FDF.1060206@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Alexey Karagodov Subject: Re: Disappointed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Stephen.Clark@seclark.us List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 19:50:52 -0000 [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >Alexey Karagodov wrote: > > >>hi. >>i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to make >>two systems at one time, one is 6.0 and another 7.0 current and they >>supporting old version, lower then 6.0 >>i want to ask developers, why you developing new system, 7.0, if you don't >>finish old, 6.0 ?! >>finish 6.0, make it work, and upgrade it to 7.0 and to 8.0 and to 9.0 and so >>on ... >>what so new and revolutionary in 7.0 in comparison with 6.0 ?! >>to use your system i must be a DEVELOPER, but i don't have so much time! i >>don't want to develope! i want to use, i want to help you with some advise ( >>e.g. what feature to add, what feature to change etc), i can and i want to >>share some of my hardware to feet your needs, make a mirror, make a test >>server/workstation/notebook/PDA etc. i'm not an freebsd developer. i'm just >>admin and a user. >>your system is most greatest i ever seen. another wonderful system is >>SOLARIS. >>but your's is so unstable ... >> >> > >All this is described in many places. It all comes down to this: if you >don't want to be a developer, JUST USE THE RELEASE BRANCH. That means >Releng_6_0 for now. > >Stable only means compatible to previous versions of the same branch. >Not that the system is stable. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Who in their right mind would think that "stable" actually means "stable"!!!