From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 28 10:24:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3917B83F; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:24:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com (mail-pa0-f53.google.com [209.85.220.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EEC19C3; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id bg4so1059800pad.26 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 02:24:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4rtpDmEPUfNnOE7sbkPhcYSe/gtsPJqJ7kQ6byv0C5Y=; b=PmvSu53LW23cKyBRkVBI7x4H2hAP4SyODRZo3tnGzLCwIKcnHalb6mMZg4xuqAhN0+ M3rVTtoh8Ue9Vquq6jvC++kLFwsz68hQALpp9WHXLfw/UJ+NVWc0eF+gSd2XMu6HN0ve ajYMu6hQOp7Z53lQJZQ9Z07D8o5d+SZr68IuuKgLHGS6b6bUsYJX0xKvNjmey/H9LlZ1 o3N6JydM634Ji7EwQrn2pzsx3UzFEUirCKYSbBTIKByKds44wh4Z+ouMq0yCaiCtcEEA cJvxjIIKemhGLQTx++55I41aLT6ycPoN0tHW/aBQcoKYdnB+dVG6ZjpdqVs7uAthA3NB B2qw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.31.130 with SMTP id a2mr8015791pbi.213.1362046778975; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 02:19:38 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.70.5.36 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 02:19:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <19510652834.20130228141147@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <1297065968.20130228140324@serebryakov.spb.ru> <19510652834.20130228141147@serebryakov.spb.ru> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 02:19:38 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qfnECvZZMj8_lFfZ2ZzhlC-erQk Message-ID: Subject: Re: Are 802.11s and "classical" AP compatible? From: Adrian Chadd To: Lev Serebryakov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:24:52 -0000 On 28 February 2013 02:11, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Adrian. > You wrote 28 =C6=C5=D7=D2=C1=CC=D1 2013 =C7., 14:04:41: > > AC> not yet, sorry. > Is it limitation of FreeBSD's drivers or "universal" one? Friend of > my have some ideas about such gateway, but he could use Linux-based > "firmaware" (OpenWRT-based, really) as well. Do you know if Linux > supports such mode? You can hack around it to make it work, but the basic problem is the Atheros MAC only supports one mode at a time - AP or STA or IBSS. When doing mesh you want to synchonise TSF different to when you're in STA = mode. The Linux guys have ath9k doing AP+mesh and STA+mesh, for various values of "works". I haven't personally tried it but I've heard reports that it does work. Again, for various values of "work". :-) You could give it a try and spend the extra time making all of the 802.11s quirks work; then figure out what other quirky behaviour happens when you're also in AP or STA mode. I don't have the time to sit down and solve whatever issues do creep up when doing mesh + other VAPs, sorry. Adrian