From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon May 19 23:34:32 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA16849
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 19 May 1997 23:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca9-46.ix.netcom.com [207.93.143.110])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA16841
          for <freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 May 1997 23:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.9) id XAA06799; Mon, 19 May 1997 23:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 19 May 1997 23:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199705200634.XAA06799@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: itojun@itojun.org
CC: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <27740.864109618@itojun.csl.sony.co.jp>
Subject: Re: ports/3521
From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * >You don't need to set both NO_PACKAGE and RESTRICTED, unless you have
 * >different reasons for each.
 * 
 * 	the restriction means,
 * 		redistribution of original package(qvplay-0.92.tar.gz) is
 * 		prohibited, so please do not include qvplay-0.92.tar.gz
 * 		into pub/FreeBSD/distfiles.
 * 	Is the RESTRICTION line clear enough for you?  If unclear,
 * 	I should elaborate RESTRICTED definition.

So no redistribution of either the tarball or FreeBSD package are not
allowed because it's beta, right?  That's clear enough for me.

Satoshi