Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:10:12 -0600 From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net> To: Vizion <vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Bart Silverstrim <bsilver@chrononomicon.com> Subject: Re: postgrey question Message-ID: <55C787E4-B2C1-452E-B0BE-797C864673F6@shire.net> In-Reply-To: <200506021303.21936.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> References: <0a6397740f09ea4ac7cce0b1bead3bde@chrononomicon.com> <08B46D9B-5FC0-4924-B287-2634268DF1A3@shire.net> <4ee98be1fb4890e46b1d7b3263d0e98d@chrononomicon.com> <200506021303.21936.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 2, 2005, at 2:03 PM, Vizion wrote: > I do not know I buy that argument. The way I see it as a user of > this list - > it ain't broken as far as I am concerned and so I'd rather it not > be fixed. > My feeling is that you would be doing people a bigger favor by > letting them > sort out their own junk mail problem. It is not a listserver's job > to fix it. > It is up to the user/isp combination to fix. > nobody was talking about the list or siggesting changing this or any other list. This was a how to get postfix to do greylisting with postgrey on freebsd question. I just brought up the point that greylisting itself is not a panacea and works better in conjunction with something like spam assassin to only grey list suspected spam. Whitelisting btw does not solve the user's problems of perception Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad@shire.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55C787E4-B2C1-452E-B0BE-797C864673F6>