From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed May 15 19:39: 0 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-162.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.162])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5A37137B406; Wed, 15 May 2002 19:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E2FB266DC8; Wed, 15 May 2002 19:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 19:38:51 -0700
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Alan E <alane@geeksrus.net>
Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>,
	FreeBSD Ports List <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	FreeBSD Port Mgr <portmgr@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: pdksh version number botch?
Message-ID: <20020515193851.A98620@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20020515211259.GA47673@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> <20020515162014.B93176@xor.obsecurity.org> <200205152207.19331.alane@geeksrus.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <200205152207.19331.alane@geeksrus.net>; from alane@geeksrus.net on Wed, May 15, 2002 at 10:07:19PM -0400
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 10:07:19PM -0400, Alan E wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 May 2002 19:20, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 05:12:59PM -0400, Alan E wrote:
> > > pdksh went from 5.2.14 to 5.2.14.p2. portupgrade sees this as a
> > > downgrade. does this need a PORTEPOCH added now, since the .p2 doesn't
> > > parse/compare correctly?
> >
> > We usually name this kind of thing like 5.2.14.2.
>=20
> Question is, what's the right thing to do now? It was just committed toda=
y, so=20
> would patching the version be OK, or since it's already there and people =
may=20
> have downloaded it, must we go the portepoch route instead?
>=20
> If I'm going to PR it, I'd like to know what the right fix is. :)

> pkg_version -t  5.2.14 5.2.14.p2
>
> pkg_version -t 5.2.14 5.2.14.2
<
> pkg_version -t 5.2.14.p2 5.2.14.2
<

Not sure what the problem is.

Kris


--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE84xu7Wry0BWjoQKURAij6AJoCYTmUeH01tPl9ud6gQl7P2ZaSiwCeKMOZ
ddq5zxgVs/jrfniTP7+Q4iM=
=/zDn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message