Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 10:56:27 -1000 From: Robert Marella <hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: favor Message-ID: <1107809787.1183.9.camel@p4> In-Reply-To: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNGEEJFAAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> References: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNGEEJFAAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 15:38 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: <many emails :)> Sorry if I offended anyone with my previous post re: freebsd-legal mail list. I just feel that all being discussed after the first 20 or so was 3 or 4 individuals expressing their opinions to each other. I _firmly_ believe that all have that right to express themselves. In fact I have fought to protect that right. That being said, I want to say I was wrong. There is more to discuss on this issue and I would like to add something. Poster 1 asks a question. Poster 2 answers with an excellent howto that solves the problem for multitudes. Me, thinking this is great, prints the post. Poster 2 decides he wants the archive wiped clean of his howto. And Freebsd complies. Can I then pass the hard copy to some of my associates without being sued? Keep up the good work. Robert
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1107809787.1183.9.camel>