Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:09:09 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@buffalo.edu> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r226835 - in head/sys: amd64/conf i386/conf ia64/conf pc98/conf powerpc/conf sparc64/conf Message-ID: <B940223C-553A-43EE-A3F7-86C65457B1C5@xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <1319721247.41652.16.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> References: <201110271307.p9RD7nAx007728@svn.freebsd.org> <1319721247.41652.16.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 27, 2011, at 6:14 AM, Ken Smith wrote: > > In response to one of my commits done to the ia64 GENERIC I received > some feedback giving a long list of issues (style, formatting, seemingly > gratuitous differences, annoyances, etc.) with the whole set of GENERIC > config files. If anyone knows a reason I should NOT act on the list > to bring all the GENERIC's into style compliance and whatnot let me > know. If nobody screams I'll do what I can to fix them up in head > some time after 9.0 is finished. If you're doing this in response to a private email, I very much object if this is done without a review. I would really hate to see a lot of churn on the stable branch after RC1 for no reason. FYI, -- Marcel Moolenaar marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B940223C-553A-43EE-A3F7-86C65457B1C5>