Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:43:01 +0200
From:      Ed Schouten <ed@nuxi.nl>
To:        Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>
Cc:        John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>, Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>,  src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org,  svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r286170 - head/share/man/man9
Message-ID:  <CABh_MK=-WQVBsNbbANUCQoEX4fuBPuaxkbPN_h9XJs7FR_0f-A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <55D6C291.2080606@selasky.org>
References:  <201508020022.t720MFqp023071@repo.freebsd.org> <20150802145434.V1128@besplex.bde.org> <CABh_MKm3cWbPu6WiP9i%2BF-6CuuAH-UAGcek8jEbN0ZxjNZ5GeA@mail.gmail.com> <55C09869.2040605@selasky.org> <20150804171051.GL78154@funkthat.com> <55D6C291.2080606@selasky.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2015-08-21 8:17 GMT+02:00 Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>:
> Here is one more argument against using "_Static_assert()":
>
> According to "http://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/_Static_assert"
> _Static_assert is C11 syntax only, and we compile the kernel using
> "-std=iso9899:1999" according to "conf/kern.mk:CFLAGS" in -current. So
> technically it shouldn't work, and it throws up compile errors with certain
> other C tools I'm using at work which are more strict than clang.

In practice it does.

-- 
Ed Schouten <ed@nuxi.nl>
Nuxi, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
KvK-nr.: 62051717



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABh_MK=-WQVBsNbbANUCQoEX4fuBPuaxkbPN_h9XJs7FR_0f-A>