From owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Fri Jan 6 19:22:53 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4CDCA2CFD for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 19:22:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brd@FreeBSD.org) Received: from valentine.liquidneon.com (valentine.liquidneon.com [216.87.78.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "valentine.liquidneon.com", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B508111D2 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 19:22:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brd@FreeBSD.org) Received: by valentine.liquidneon.com (Postfix, from userid 1018) id C99052FD94; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 12:22:45 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 12:22:45 -0700 From: Brad Davis To: Erdos New Cc: franco@lastsummer.de, freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg : Undefined symbol "openat" Message-ID: <20170106192245.GZ70816@corpmail.liquidneon.com> References: <48F1944E-B6D3-440B-AD08-FCB76993357F@lastsummer.de> <15974fd9b76-4ea4-3d956@webprd-m20.mail.aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15974fd9b76-4ea4-3d956@webprd-m20.mail.aol.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 19:22:53 -0000 On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 01:14:54PM -0500, Erdos New via freebsd-pkg wrote: > for now i'd like to stay with 10.1 instead of upgrading to 10.3. Why would you stay with something that is not supported? Regards, Brad Davis