Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 00:40:55 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: Andrew Thompson <thompsa@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bridge and PF Message-ID: <20050812224055.GF45385@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> In-Reply-To: <200508121751.27737.max@love2party.net> References: <1123858936.22864.252.camel@torgau.office.netline.net.uk> <1123861547.22864.256.camel@torgau.office.netline.net.uk> <200508121751.27737.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, > This is not true. As Scott suggested try if_bridge in 6.0 which has both > IPv6 > and full pf support. Additionally, pf is supported by the old bridge just > use the same settings you would use for ipf. The old bridge does not allow > for stateful filtering however. The same is true for ipf and ipfw with the > old bridge code. Does if_bridge generally support PF_HOOKS (thus one can use ipfw), or is it strictly bound to pf ? Thanks. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050812224055.GF45385>