From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 00:14:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B5416A4CE for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 00:14:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout2.barnet.com.au (mailout2.barnet.com.au [218.185.88.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1DE43D2F for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 00:14:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: by mailout2.barnet.com.au (Postfix, from userid 27) id B5AB7AA6194; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:14:03 +1100 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <406537CB00013CF41CFE54@BarNet> Received: from mail2-auth.barnet.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1459B29D94 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:14:02 +1100 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (unknown [10.10.12.2]) by mail2-auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A3519308 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:13:59 +1100 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 22DF76199; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:13:41 +1100 (EST) Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:10:15 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Sergey Matveychuk Message-ID: <20040327001015.GC2124@k7.mavetju> References: <4062FF7A.2040509@ciam.ru> <20040326232205.GD57192@sirius.firepipe.net> <20040327022929.B22129@avim.ciam.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040327022929.B22129@avim.ciam.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Resent-From: edwin@mavetju.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:13:41 +1100 Resent-To: ports@freebsd.org Resent-Message-Id: <20040327081341.22DF76199@k7.mavetju> Subject: Re: Sign your name in pkg-descr is useless or useful? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 08:14:08 -0000 On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:47:46AM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > IMHO Email address could be simply parsed any way. > Regexp not so difficult for it: > [A-Za-z0-9_-]+@[A-Za-z0-9-]+(\.[A-Za-z0-9-]+)*\.[A-Za-z]+ You're forgetting the + in the username (see java/kafe) I would go for "[\s<](.+?@.+?)[>\s]" Not sure if it is e?sed compatible. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/