Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 09:38:55 -0500 From: "Daniel M. Eischen" <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@chomsky.Pinyon.ORG>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threads models and FreeBSD. (Next Step) Message-ID: <38258EFF.399F9D5F@vigrid.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911070237440.10573-100000@current1.whistle.com> <38258BFA.B7EA3ECB@vigrid.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Daniel M. Eischen" wrote: > > Except for very narrow windows where threads holding critical resources > (internal to the threads library) are continued until they release the > resource. I can also see the need for threads to cross scheduling group > boundaries in order to support priority protection and priority ceiling ^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^ Eek! These are one and the same. I meant priority _inheritence_ and priority protection mutexes. Dan Eischen eischen@vigrid.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38258EFF.399F9D5F>