From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 30 21:53:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B415B16A41C for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:53:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from neptune.atopia.net (neptune.atopia.net [209.128.231.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEBE43D1F for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:53:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: by neptune.atopia.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1AF3E417A; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:53:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by neptune.atopia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C8D4D; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:53:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:53:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Juszczak To: Maciej Wierzbicki In-Reply-To: <20050630213541.GA26335@mail.media4u.pl> Message-ID: <20050630175234.J67125@neptune.atopia.net> References: <20050630164529.D65760@neptune.atopia.net> <20050630213541.GA26335@mail.media4u.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Two Options: which to choose? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:53:20 -0000 > After changing to PF I did not notice single crash for month (production > servers with, sometimes, heavy load). > > I would try FreeBSD with PF anyway. Works perfectly. You say it didn't crash for a month, but then you say to try FreeBSD with PF because it works perfectly. To me, a month of uptime isn't perfectly. Can you elaborate? Is your machine still crashing even though its taking a month instead of a few days like it did previously? Thanks, Matt