Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:51:38 +0400 From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r190031 - head/etc/defaults Message-ID: <20090409155138.GD7795@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <20090409153805.GB83847@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <200903191248.n2JCm0Rd061331@svn.freebsd.org> <20090409131253.GB7795@hades.panopticon> <20090409153805.GB83847@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Brooks Davis (brooks@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > Shouldn't synchronous_dhclient be ON by default then? The way it > > is, DHCP is not used at all, I ended up with unreachable box which > > didn't get any IP already. > > Unless you have one of the few interfaces that does not generate > link status events, dhclient will be started by devd. The only ones I > know of are a subset set of ed(4) devices, though I think imp may have > fixed those recently with a stub ifmedia interface. I use ale(4). Will test some more. Couldn't the fact that the interface is renamed be the reason? Also, how is the issue of services not starting because of no default route/dns/network available solved when running dhclient from devd? -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090409155138.GD7795>