Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:18:35 +0700 From: Sharkie <shark.fin.soup@mac.com> To: Rene Ladan <r.c.ladan@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which Java Freebsd 7.0 Message-ID: <3B156B41-D52F-4807-BB85-5CAA611EF4D6@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <e890cae60808180507o45c3186dj9e707003827826e1@mail.gmail.com> References: <5361254E-6DDC-4BCA-AAB8-8276C7DB18EE@mac.com> <e890cae60808180507o45c3186dj9e707003827826e1@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I tried linux-sun-jdk16 and get this error: /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.6.0/bin/java -version /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.6.0/bin/java: error while loading shared libraries: libjli.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory On Aug 18, 2008, at 7:07 PM, Rene Ladan wrote: > 2008/8/18 Sharkie <shark.fin.soup@mac.com>: >> I believe my machine is running Libthr. >> >> Should I either install >> >> 1) Install linux-sun-jdk16 from ports >> 2) Install Diablo from ports >> 3) Download Diablo as binary >> >> Do these choices make any difference? I need the best performance >> possible. >> > Option 2 and 3 should be identical, the port is a wrapper around the > diablo binaries. > > Option 1 might be faster, it probably depends on the context. You > could also try installing > java/jdk16 which installs a slightly older version than diablo does. > > HTH, > Rene > -- > http://www.rene-ladan.nl/ > > GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 > (subkeys.pgp.net)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B156B41-D52F-4807-BB85-5CAA611EF4D6>