From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct  3 13:26:54 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C19106568C;
	Fri,  3 Oct 2008 13:26:54 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il)
Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C058FC16;
	Fri,  3 Oct 2008 13:26:53 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il)
Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32])
	by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp
	id 1KlkgH-000Iv9-2A; Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:26:53 +0300
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
In-reply-to: <alpine.BSF.1.10.0810031022140.41647@fledge.watson.org> 
References: <E1Kj7NA-000FXz-3F@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
	<20080926081806.GA19055@icarus.home.lan>
	<E1Kj9bR-000H7t-0g@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
	<20080926095230.GA20789@icarus.home.lan>
	<E1KjEZw-000KkH-GP@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
	<alpine.BSF.1.10.0809271114450.20117@fledge.watson.org>
	<E1KjY2h-0008GC-PP@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
	<b41c75520809290140i435a5f6dge5219cd03cad55fe@mail.gmail.com>
	<E1Klfac-000DzZ-Ie@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
	<alpine.BSF.1.10.0810030910351.41647@fledge.watson.org>
	<E1KlgYe-000Es2-8u@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
	<alpine.BSF.1.10.0810031003440.41647@fledge.watson.org>
	<E1KlgnA-000F6w-NT@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
	<alpine.BSF.1.10.0810031022140.41647@fledge.watson.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
	message dated "Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:25:23 +0100."
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:26:53 +0300
From: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Message-ID: <E1KlkgH-000Iv9-2A@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bad NFS/UDP performance 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:26:54 -0000

> 
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, Danny Braniss wrote:
> 
> > gladly, but have no idea how to do LOCK_PROFILING, so some pointers would be 
> > helpfull.
> 
> The LOCK_PROFILING(9) man page isn't a bad starting point -- I find that the 
> defaults work fine most of the time, so just use them.  Turn the enable syscl 
> on just before you begin a run, and turn it off immediately afterwards.  Make 
> sure to reset between reruns (rebooting to a new kernel is fine too!).
> 
in ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/lock.prof
there 3 files:
	7.1-100		host connected at 100 running -prerelease
	7.1-1000	same but connected at 1000
	7.0-1000	-stable with your 'patch' 
at 100 my benchmark didn't suffer from the profiling, average was about 9.
at 1000 the benchmark got realy hit, average was around 12 for the patched,
and 4 for the unpatched (less than at 100).

danny