From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar  2 18:23:43 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD30778
 for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Sat,  2 Mar 2013 18:23:43 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from cross+freebsd@distal.com)
Received: from mail.distal.com (mail.distal.com [IPv6:2001:470:e24c:200::ae25])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E002EB51
 for <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>; Sat,  2 Mar 2013 18:23:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from magrathea.distal.com (magrathea.distal.com [206.138.151.12])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by mail.distal.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r22INbaG017196
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
 Sat, 2 Mar 2013 13:23:38 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Subject: Re: Problems booting 9.1-STABLE on Netra X1
From: Chris Ross <cross+freebsd@distal.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130302005318.GA22053@alchemy.franken.de>
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 13:23:37 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FFAEF446-E683-420B-882E-08ADDCB87B2A@distal.com>
References: <CE371F2B-CF62-4695-A9F0-B56995BA3CC6@distal.com>
 <20130225101315.GA79064@alchemy.franken.de>
 <76C74932-5BB0-4194-86CE-F121F6D18D84@distal.com>
 <20130225214941.GD955@alchemy.franken.de>
 <3A37672E-B6F7-4D5E-8293-0ED3B203C358@distal.com>
 <20130226013400.GG955@alchemy.franken.de>
 <5F00D05B-37BB-4342-AE56-C707B5267C17@distal.com>
 <20130302005318.GA22053@alchemy.franken.de>
To: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: "freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org" <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-sparc64>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
 <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 18:23:43 -0000


On Mar 1, 2013, at 19:53 , Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> =
wrote:
> Craig Butler confirmed my impression that generally there's no =
downside
> from registering a handler for the power fail interrupt on X1 (or V100
> for that matter). So I did what I initially thought would be the best
> option if the affected machine(s) indeed run stable despite this issue
> and added a loader tunable in r247600. By setting hw.psycho.powerfail =
to
> 0 you can now disable setting up the interrupt handler.

  Thank you.  I look forward to being able to throw out the if clause I =
put
into my tree and doing it in the "official" way.  Will that be MFC'd to =
stable/9 ?

                - Chris