From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Dec  2 06:45:39 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id GAA27470
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 2 Dec 1995 06:45:39 -0800
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id GAA27447
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 2 Dec 1995 06:45:25 -0800
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA29283
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5 for hackers@freebsd.org); Sat, 2 Dec 1995 08:31:49 -0600
Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id IAA02500; Sat, 2 Dec 1995 08:18:10 -0600
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 1995 08:18:10 -0600
From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
Message-Id: <199512021418.IAA02500@bonkers.taronga.com>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ideas from netbsd
Newsgroups: taronga.freebsd.hackers
In-Reply-To: <199511081749.KAA20366@phaeton.artisoft.com>
References: <199511080735.SAA22789@werple.net.au>
Organization: Taronga Park BBS
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Terry Lambert  <terry@lambert.org> wrote:
>But what it has to "gain" by not doing it is gratuitous incompatability.

I don't understand why "being compatible with NetBSD" and "having a
COMPAT_NETBSD hack that can be turned on and off" are equivalent
statements.