Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 6 Nov 1999 16:47:32 -0500 (EST)
From:      Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Dmitrij Tejblum <tejblum@arc.hq.cti.ru>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current Users' list <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Serious locking problem in CURRENT 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911061644340.1075-100000@green.myip.org>
In-Reply-To: <199911062057.XAA03228@tejblum.pp.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 6 Nov 1999, Dmitrij Tejblum wrote:

> Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> > There were zero comments about what order things happen in; in fact,
> > the ordering in this case is Just Plain Lame (TM).  It's much more
> > correct to explicitly check for fp->f_count == 1.
> 
> Not sure what you mean. The commit clearly states that POSIX and BSD 
> locking intentionally handled in different ways here. Frankly, I see 
> nothing lame in the ordering. The second VOP_ADVLOCK just should be 
> moved to fdrop().

Yes, but you implied that there was some part of the commenting that
I must have missed in rev.1.68, but there was nothing about that. I
think I'll get an okay from bruce and move the unlock to fdrop();  I
have still been pondering which is more correct, actually.

> 
> > > BTW, I have another little concern with that commit: It make possible for 
> > > last close() of a file descriptor to return 0 instead of the error from 
> > > VOP_CLOSE(), and the error from VOP_CLOSE() to be ignored.
> 
> When a process do closef() on a descriptor "held" by another process 
> (by fhold(), e.g. the process do read() on the descriptor), it will 
> just return 0 without the call to fo_close(). Then, when the other 
> process drop the descriptor, fdrop() call fo_close() but the error is 
> thrown away. No?

Yes, this is what I thought you could have meant.  But would you
rather lose that error in a corner case or do locking on the fd/fdtable
or just let the system crash in that case?  I'm open for a better solution.

> 
> Dima
> 
> 
> 

-- 
 Brian Fundakowski Feldman           \  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!  /
 green@FreeBSD.org                    `------------------------------'



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9911061644340.1075-100000>