From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 10:48:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44F8106566C; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:48:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A6A8FC0A; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:48:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1S1bel-0007nr-6X>; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:48:43 +0100 Received: from e178009215.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.9.215] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1S1bel-0007N0-1M>; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:48:43 +0100 Message-ID: <4F4A0E04.1080601@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:48:36 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120223 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eduardo Morras References: <4F462189.3040106@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4EFDA80600B0354D@> (added by postmaster@resmaa14.ono.com) In-Reply-To: <4EFDA80600B0354D@> (added by postmaster@resmaa14.ono.com) X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6112DC3C769AE6AA657C5D96" X-Originating-IP: 85.178.9.215 Cc: Current FreeBSD , Ports FreeBSD Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:48:45 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6112DC3C769AE6AA657C5D96 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote: > At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote: >> Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not eve= n >> for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is >> written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE >> was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated >> version in the ports suited our needs. >> >> Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I >> filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. >> >> I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use >> CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried >> devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of >> configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and= >> not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. >> >> devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since man= y >> of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, >> but it is marked "broken" on FreeBSD. >> >> Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA,= >> I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the= >> focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBloc= ks >> is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. >> >> Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm >> also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity= >> to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an I= DE >> is needed. >> >> Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. >=20 > Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on > ports is 3.0 not 3.5. On the webpage you have information about how to > configure for use with clang/llvm. Codelite looks nice. But why is codelite setup in editors/codelite and not in devel/codelite as other IDEs? By the way, do all IDEs supported by FreeBSD suffer from being outdated and aged eons? CodeLite 3.5 is at this very moment the most recent version and claims to provide a much better LLVM/CLANG support. Hope I can convince the maintainer by sending a PR ;-) >=20 >> Oliver >=20 >=20 --------------enig6112DC3C769AE6AA657C5D96 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPSg4KAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8vsoH/1asaGPsnPBmejjAo/cSb42R BPpTogBPTwp88l09hToKPYNNnrUuxlgt8vPcL3EO3JzHFKHrpogmw/IXLnj8Ftuw CA2Ya7B/QU6jQqYbziFzcsrrv7sDEvud7W1rYnIKEX016rzZF8b1z2O/TYGLGZ2Q H0oKC0ojaOTs71JlGnIA1LRqktc20DFq52QzvnxDmJbzKnWKaVsYTkseExixTM50 pGC9vx6QH0MQUkCGNMsoGRDn8R9/9umdlXAXCsxiN2UnpwyJVmyJZ+opoC4AbrOn r12SLIrAYYcws3hK0nuk6pBCflbq+Pgb/KUAcIEGuQaYz/WMvVth1OucAh3YfQs= =l1Zm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6112DC3C769AE6AA657C5D96--