Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 17:48:45 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> To: Alexander Leidinger <netchild@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, nork@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports CHANGES UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.port.mk ports/accessibility/linux-atk Makefile pkg-plist ports/archivers/stuffit Makefile ports/astro/linux-setiathome Makefile ports/audio/baudline Makefile ports/audio/linux-arts ... Message-ID: <200506261748.49553.lofi@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20050626171623.63802b99@Magellan.Leidinger.net> References: <200506172259.j5HMxTad068378@repoman.freebsd.org> <200506261307.56772.lofi@freebsd.org> <20050626171623.63802b99@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1252485.1XIAtJTPTT
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Sunday, 26. June 2005 17:16, you wrote:
> > > The X11R6 distribution contains servers, utilities and more (libs/data
> > > files/...). Specifying them and then adding "local packages/ports"
> > > suggest to me, that not only binaries which come with the X11R6
> > > distribution are allowed to reside here.
> >
> > PLEASE STOP being silly for the sake of argument!
>
> This is how I read it. Really. I'm honest.
Okay. But even if I read it your way, i.e. each line by itself, not caring=
=20
about the context of the parent directory, your change still violates=20
hier(7):
X11R6/ X11R6 distribution executables, libraries, etc
(optional).
bin/ X11R6 binaries (servers, utilities, loc=
al
packages/ports)
[...]
lib/ X11R6 libraries.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
No ports/packages-installed files allowed in X11R6/lib, yet=20
www/linux-flashplugin6 installs files to /usr/X11R6/lib/linux-flashplugin6/=
=20
now.
> > > - As soon as a new way of doing it is published, I will follow it.
> >
> > It really is colleagues like you that make working on FreeBSD that extra
> > bit satisfactory.
>
> It would be nice if you could calm down and keep the discussion on a
> technical level.
*sigh* Sorry about that, I let myself get worked up. But please see above.
I still fail to see ambiguity in hier(7) about the issue general, but at le=
ast=20
I'm very sure there's just no way to interpret it in a way that justifies=20
installing the browser plugins into X11BASE.
=2D-=20
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
--nextPart1252485.1XIAtJTPTT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBCvs5hXhc68WspdLARArmLAKCn6uY3R4JP74xwleTUdHaLAM/AxQCcD/v+
oue1twqKUdh+y7uZBi7cbVs=
=6Fhu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1252485.1XIAtJTPTT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506261748.49553.lofi>