From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan  7 08:10:44 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21AFABD6;
 Mon,  7 Jan 2013 08:10:44 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at)
Received: from fep15.mx.upcmail.net (fep15.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.35])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D596CE3;
 Mon,  7 Jan 2013 08:10:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from edge04.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.239]) by viefep15-int.chello.at
 (InterMail vM.8.01.05.05 201-2260-151-110-20120111) with ESMTP
 id <20130107081034.NJYV2598.viefep15-int.chello.at@edge04.upcmail.net>;
 Mon, 7 Jan 2013 09:10:34 +0100
Received: from mole.fafoe.narf.at ([80.109.55.137])
 by edge04.upcmail.net with edge
 id kwAa1k00f2xdvHc04wAaPG; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 09:10:34 +0100
X-SourceIP: 80.109.55.137
Received: by mole.fafoe.narf.at (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id 5569C6D47C; Mon,  7 Jan 2013 09:10:34 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 09:10:34 +0100
From: Stefan Farfeleder <stefanf@FreeBSD.org>
To: David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: clang 3.2 RC2 miscompiles libgcc?
Message-ID: <20130107081033.GA1446@mole.fafoe.narf.at>
References: <20121227150724.GA1431@mole.fafoe.narf.at>
 <50DC65F5.6060004@freebsd.org> <50E0BD66.4070609@FreeBSD.org>
 <20130102135950.GA1464@mole.fafoe.narf.at>
 <20130104154940.GD1430@mole.fafoe.narf.at>
 <20130106141708.GA1418@mole.fafoe.narf.at>
 <EA4BC8F5-A501-4E4A-A223-7572B9A65758@FreeBSD.org>
 <50E9AAF4.209@freebsd.org>
 <78AC11F6-7AAE-449D-9ED1-DB5B207152DA@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <78AC11F6-7AAE-449D-9ED1-DB5B207152DA@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>,
 Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:10:44 -0000

On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 04:51:11PM +0000, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 6 Jan 2013, at 16:48, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> 
> > No. It's completely broken at all optimization levels. There do not
> > appear to be any flags that change the behavior. Building unwind-dw2.c
> > either with gcc or with the previous import of clang in our tree does
> > fix it, however.
> 
> Do you have an LLVM PR# for this that I can follow?

There's http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8541 which I think should
be reopened.

Stefan